776

"It doesn’t make sense for chocolate bars to be divided into equal-sized chunks when there is so much inequality in the chocolate industry! The unequally-sized chunks of our 6.35 oz bars are a palatable way of reminding Choco Fans and Serious Friends that the profits in the chocolate industry are unequally divided.

And in case you haven’t noticed, the bottom of our bars depicts the West African coastline. The chunks just above it represent the Gulf of Guinea. From left to right, you have Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Togo and Benin (terribly politically incorrect, we know, but we had to combine them to create enough space for a hazelnut), Nigeria and part of Cameroon."

From https://us.tonyschocolonely.com/pages/faqs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 185 points 2 months ago

I love it, but I feel obligated to say

"It doesn’t make sense for chocolate bars to be divided into equal-sized chunks when there is so much inequality in the chocolate industry!

No, it makes sense. I understand, but it makes a lot more sense

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 110 points 2 months ago

It doesn’t make sense for cars to have 4 equal sized wheels when there is so much inequality in the auto industry.

[-] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Staggered setup vehicles are the true champions of justice, urging us all to get a grip on inequality within the industry.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

My center differential disagrees

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 months ago

Ok but this is a good way to raise awareness about the issue. Many people will pick these bars in the store without knowing much about the brand. Then when they eat it, they will probably wonder why it's divided like that and the explanation is right there on the inside of the wrapper.

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

And then never buy them again because they are difficult to break evenly. Great idea but poor execution imo.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 17 points 2 months ago

Do you buy chocolate based on convenience over taste?

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago
[-] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My internal chocolate bar cost has gone way up. I find the stuff at the bottom (like the stuff at the checkout) doesn't even taste like chocolate anymore. I usually get something from the specialty section now.

I agree. The budget snack items like chocolate, chips and so on have, in my opinion, lost a lot of quality; they taste a lot greasier, have worse "mouth-feel", or are just sugar with less aroma depending on the product. I also buy less, but higher quality stuff now in comparison to 20 years ago. (Central Europe here)

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

Fair, I do remember eating a lot of Tesco Value chocolate back in the day

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

lol imagine sharing your chocolate bars with other people, tssk (/hj)

fr tho if that bothers you, the inequality that comes with other chocolate brands should bother you too

not saying Tony's is 100% fair, but at least they put in a lot of effort to make it as fair as possible

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

When did I ever say anything against that or that I am ok with slavery?? I even mentioned it as a good idea but with that execution, you will be cutting your own sales. At the end of the day, it's a product for consumers and if your idea, no matter how great and noble it is, compromises on the experience then you will lose customers.

It well be cool to see for the first time but I certainly wouldn't pick it up again if there are similar products with similar ideology on the shelf which is much easier to consumer. If this worked then good for them but I doubt it well work for long.

Also who the hell mows down an entire bar in single sitting, is that an American thing? I usually buy a bar of dark chocolate and eat 1 piece after every meal or when I am bored/hungry. I would never pick something like this other than maybe the first time and fiddle with it every time making a mess trying to break a piece.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

if there are similar products with similar ideology on the shelf

that's the thing: there aren't

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

There are literally hundreds of them. Maybe the availability is different in your area but I can guarantee you that they are not the only one. But regardless you are missing the point.

It's good for a company to be ethical but if you can't sustain a business enough to make a difference then it's pointless. At the end of the day, a business is there to make a profit. If you ignore majority of the customers and focus on the small fraction who cares about ethical products enough to make compromise then you can't stay float for long.

It's a good novel approach to raise awareness but the cost for it is too big, that was my point.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Bro it's just uneven pieces of chocolate it's not that of a big deal. Clearly they can sustain a business because I'm encountering their products more and more often. Apparently they don't need the support of people like you who nitpick about every little thing so go ahead and buy other brands if that's what makes you happy.

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Yeah this copy needed a couple more drafts/notes.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
776 points (90.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17350 readers
403 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS