28
submitted 2 months ago by Burstar@sopuli.xyz to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

@QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz @lisko@sopuli.xyz @doo@sh.itjust.works @Moxvallix@sopuli.xyz

I've been getting complaints about footage that is technically non-violent but leaves enough to the imagination that it apparently bothers people, so I wanted to get input regarding where the NSFW line should be drawn.

The video posted here is a perfect example of where I think the limit is. The only complaint I can see is the discharge of a firearm. Does that count? Is 'being able to put 2 and 2 together to know what happened' enough to warrant flagging as NSFW? Was the previous status quo good enough?

Setting aside the obvious "I know it when I see it", please share your thoughts.

Until a better consensus of where the line should be for the community I will leave it temporarily flagged as NSFW.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Burstar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

I'm being objective. It is an assumption either way as there is no concrete evidence visible in the video. Do you think every drone cam that cuts to static should be flagged as NSFW?

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

All combat footage should probably be flagged nsfw, honestly.

Since nsfw flagging is just a tool and doesn’t mean “boobies” it’s likely the best method. Otherwise folks who don’t want to see combat footage only have the option of unsubscribing or blocking the community from preventing autoplay of videos on some clients.

[-] Burstar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

All combat footage should probably be flagged nsfw,

I think that is too aggressive. There is all kinds of footage that is clearly safe (eg: drone on drone).

I'm thinking a rule requiring NSFW for combat footage where bodies (living or otherwise) are visible.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You’re introducing a subjective measure of what is ok by interpreting the line.

Just make the line combat footage. Then you don’t have to police it or make judgement calls.

I personally don’t need anything flagged, I’m fine with the content as is but I’m trying to take an objective stance here with the input from others. Take the subjective decisions out of it and make it an easy line for all to follow.

[-] Burstar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

@LaFinlandia@sopuli.xyz this will probably affect you most. Thoughts?

[-] LaFinlandia@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

I believe a [Combat] tag/flair in the title would be a fair compromise.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8437 readers
695 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

💳💥 Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

💳⚕️⛑️ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

🪖 🫡 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS