this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
253 points (98.8% liked)

196

17000 readers
1379 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xedrak@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m sorry, but this point of view is so brain-dead to me. What do you think happens when a billionaire dies? The money magically disappears? It’s redistributed to the masses? No, it’s inherited by relatives. Killing billionaires only creates different billionaires. How about we use our brains and come up with actual solutions rather than parroting brain-dead bullshit?

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're taking the argument at it's most basic level, assuming that we would kill the billionaires and then sit around twiddling out thumbs. I don't think it's much of a leap to assume we'd change how the system works as well lol.

[–] xedrak@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ok? Then maybe do that without the murder part??? If you have actual ideas of how to change the system, then do it?

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're not going to give up their control willingly, hence the killing them part.

[–] xedrak@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

But you still haven’t refuted my main point. If killing them just creates new billionaires, what does that actually achieve?

[–] AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean the general idea is we kill them and take their property instead of giving it to their heirs. Killing the billionaires is generally something that occurs as part of the larger revolution and not just a leisurely Sunday activity

[–] xedrak@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sure, and that worked when money was a tangible asset rather than a speculative one. It really doesn’t apply in modern times when most money can’t be physically taken.

[–] AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

Bro what part of a revolution do you not understand. The people saying this stuff are communists and leftists. After a revolution there won't be stocks left to own or corporations. The whole point of communist revolution is to seize the companies and desolve the capitalist institutions. Surely you understand this no?

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

Do you think billionaires actually have billions sitting in banks holy shit. They own assets bruh. That's what we'd be taking.

[–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Why not murdering them AND Robin Hood all their shit? At least until the systemic problem that made them billionaires in the first place gets dismantled bit by bit.

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

It wouldn't create new billionaires if you're also changing the system lol that was my point.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago

"Ok, can we do this french revolution without killing the aristocracy? If you have actual ideas of how to change the system, then do it?"

Maybe an online petition, those always work.