81
submitted 6 days ago by PanArab@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

Blocking the sale of a military aircraft is not the same thing as an arms embargo.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

“I think it is clear that Congress has a responsibility to act. We have legal tools here. And as I said, we cannot approve the sale of arms to a country that is in violation of our own laws on this."

F15s were just the next thing to be sent.

[-] Chulk@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

And yet, Warren voted "yes" to sending $15b worth of military aid to Israel only weeks later..

One could argue that, because there was other aid to Ukraine tied into the bill, Warren didn't want to risk the passage of the bill. I would say that a supposedly principled senator like Warren should have realized the gravity of the situation and follow her brave words with brave action. Other senators like Sanders and Merkley voted No on this bill for exactly that reason. In fact, Sanders tried to introduce an amendment that removed Isreal's funding from the bill but received no support from people like Warren..

One could argue that Gaza aid was tied into the bill as well. However, Israel has been known to be blocking aid into the region, even before this vote took place. If Warren truly cared about the refugees/people of Gaza, she would have supported Sanders' second amendment to the bill to restore funding to the UNRWA, which provides most of the food, water and shelter to Palestinians. But she didn't.

I couldn't find any other mention of her supporting an arms embargo after this vote either (unless I'm missing it, which is entirely possible given how difficult it is to find this shit). I remain unconvinced of Warren's resolve on this matter.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
81 points (98.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7226 readers
176 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS