85

My roommate has been educating himself on communism, and we have been having many great conversations on theory and what have you. He says he is a communist. However, he has come to some very different conclusions to me, and I have been going back and forth on his talking points a lot. I was wondering what you guys would think of his talking points since I have to hear them and discuss them with him a lot.

  1. Vanguardism/council republics are inherently flawed and undemocratic. He admits that there is democracy within a Marxist-Leninist government, but says it is not good enough because you don't vote directly for the president, etc...

  2. Says that vanguardism is "elitist" and that the core of the idea is that the working classes are stupid and only the intelligentsia knows right. He said he liked Lenin but he was too "mean" and didn't speak as kindly of the peasants as he wanted. (lol)

  3. Attributes the fall of the USSR entirely to the democratic organization of the government. Says that if the Soviet Union had allowed a more "libertarian" "democratic" structure what happened wouldn't have happened. I've also notice he attributes a lot of China's problems historically to the way their government is structured.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] roux@hexbear.net 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Have your roommate look into Syndicalism and Libertarian Socialism.

Syndicalism to the best of my understanding is a system similar enough to Vanguard/Council Communism but each worker in a worker collective/guild/co-op/union will have a vote, instead of like in Council Communism, where a delegate may vote on behalf of the people they represent.

Libertarian Socialism(or Social Libertarianism, idk if there is a difference) is the school of thought that Noam Chomsky subscribes to. I admit, in Requiem for the American Dream, Chomsky does make a compelling argument in favor of this kind of system. I haven't revisited the doc/book in many years so this is coming from a stale pre-ML theory perspective.

I've seen 2 cases of bona fide leftists proclaiming they are Libertarian in the same case as your roommate, and I think that in both cases, they are referring to the "political compass" version of Libertarian(anti-authoritarian) and not the bastardized version that the US has developed a la Rand and Ron Paul et al. But the word has been co-opted so he could be a Rand Paul Libertarian and confused, or just confused due to lack of reading.

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
85 points (98.9% liked)

chat

8202 readers
481 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS