54
submitted 1 week ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

Funny comparison. One is a yearly multiplayer-ish release and the other is a sequel to a 13 year old singleplayer action game. I have no doubt AW2 could sell a ton more copies… but they’ve decided they don’t want that

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 6 points 1 week ago

No, they decided that Epic was the best bet to get the game done at all as they were willing to finance it, and this is the unfortunate outcome.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

Yep, I’m aware of why they went with Epic, but if Epic wanted to make more of a return they’d put the game on the platform with more paying users. But they decided they don’t want that

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sorry, I thought you were blaming Remedy and not Epic.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

Fair, I wasn’t clear! I’m sure Remedy would LOVE to get the game in as many player’s hands as they could

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
54 points (92.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8651 readers
644 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS