766
firefox rule (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago by blibla@slrpnk.net to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 13 points 2 weeks ago

Unused RAM is wasted RAM. It consumes the exact same amount of power whether there's useful data in it or not. Any self-respecting operating system will fill up RAM that applications aren't using with frequently accessed files, so they're ready to go in an instant.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think that's precisely why limiting RAM on apps like Chrome or Firefox is so necessary, these apps never release their RAM when they are supposed to, they hoard anything that isn't free and don't give back when it's needed, which is why in the reply to the top comment I shared a desktop entry to limit RAM on Firefox or whatever app you so choose.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, I totally agree. Being afraid to call out to the allocator because "hey, I might need that memory later" is kinda not great. To a certain extent I can see how if an application tends to thrash memory, making a kajillion syscalls might hurt performance, enough that on many machines the gains from doing a single big allocation on the system and then slicing it up into small allocations in-process might outweigh the downsides, but still...

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
766 points (97.5% liked)

196

16656 readers
3511 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS