214
submitted 3 weeks ago by Hubi@feddit.org to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

NATO would allow the US to go home; it's more than strong enough. Though the US power would certainly be missed, especially since it was partly their idea to have friends against common enemies and stay safe.

The rules exist for very good reasons and are the cornerstones of what ensures NATO is a peace-keeping.defenaive pact, not a biased empirical-style alliance. Also, keep in mind that all countries of NATO are free to involve themselves in the Ukrainian War, they just cannot do so under the NATO banner. And if their homelands are attacked in retaliation, NATO will be less oblige as they fundamentally are anti-aggressor.

If Trump left NATO, the US actions will be remembered and it's unlikely they'd get back in with the same powers.

[-] troed@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

Without the agreement of the US a lot of the weapon systems NATO members have cannot be used. That's the downside of using common components and platforms throughout the alliance.

[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's literally the opposite purpose of having common munitions.

[-] troed@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. We've learnt a lot from how countries have acted when we've tried giving weapons and munitions to Ukraine the last few years.

The Swedish Gripen airplanes are still not in Ukraine. It's not due to Sweden or Ukraine ...

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The weapons "cant be used" in the diplomatic sense, it not like the bombs phone up the pentegon to ask permission to be used. If we're talking about the US ripping up all its commitments I think other countries might be less inclined to pay attention to those.

[-] troed@fedia.io 0 points 3 weeks ago

... which would cause Trump to cancel trade most certainly. I'm a citizen of a European Nato member and I don't believe we can take that risk.

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Probably yes, but if its at the point of European NATO having to fight directly that's likely a second order consideration.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
214 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39387 readers
2532 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS