436
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Journalists are increasingly abandoning X (formerly Twitter) for Bluesky, citing higher engagement and less toxicity. Since Elon Musk’s takeover of X, changes like deprioritizing external links and rising hate speech have alienated many, especially marginalized groups.

Bluesky, founded by Jack Dorsey, offers a more welcoming environment, especially for journalists and activists, with 20x the engagement in some cases.

Reporters note better traffic, reduced harassment, and a focus on diverse stories.

Organizations like The Guardian and fundraising groups also report greater success on Bluesky compared to X.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

This time he bailed early though. He's got no control of the site

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 weeks ago

No the site just owes a bunch of money to the crypto bros at Blockchain Capital.

Doesn't matter if Dorsey isn't there and if it's a PBC, if the investors want a return on their investment (and they do) enshittification is coming.

[-] Fediverse_Champion@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Nice, thanks for the link. I knew almost all of this stuff but never had a place where it was all tied together and organized neatly. Now I do. Cheers.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -1 points 3 weeks ago

It's open source and designed to literally not be reliant on the company running it. Start a community appview and plc and you can bring your entire account history with you

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

These are aspirational goals and not at all actively true now. They are technically possible, but not actually viable as a social media network.

Its design was based on a drop in for twitter, and will always require a megacorp sized entity for it to operate, due to a "god's eye view of all data" model requiring huge, faste data lifts to exist at all.

Best case is some opensource org like internet archive/wikipedia willing to spend 6-7 figures/month(raw costs +engineering talent) on running the service, but so far none have.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

There's already others running other relays. The appview is the most difficult, but in theory indexes on top of the data could be shared too which would reduce the need for each appview to have everything saved in advance

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The relays are test level only. They are at the stage where people are dipping their toys in the water to see if it's actually a resilient protocol.

There are no viable alternatives right now, and there may never be.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's not actually decentralized or federated, but keep telling yourself that.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

Tell that to the people running their own PDS servers and the people running whitewind and all the other services built on the protocol

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
436 points (96.8% liked)

News

23659 readers
3035 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS