submitted 1 month ago by Espiritdescali@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Plants are many other of magnitude better than this.
Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) :

[-] monogram@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo)

Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

huh ? Jup Rock ? ... is this chalk ?
(we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks ... maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)

[-] monogram@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

See edit

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024

28 points (86.8% liked)

Futurology

1884 readers

271 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS