Futurology

2439 readers

680 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 4 months ago by Espiritdescali@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Plants are many other of magnitude better than this.
Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) :

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo)

Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

huh ? Jup Rock ? ... is this chalk ?
(we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks ... maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

See edit