742
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

President Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, reversing his prior stance against using executive clemency.

The pardon covers Hunter’s federal gun conviction and tax evasion guilty plea, sparking political controversy.

Biden cited political attacks and a “miscarriage of justice” as reasons for his decision, emphasizing his son’s recovery from addiction and the targeting of his family.

Critics argue the move undermines the judicial process, while supporters view it as within Biden’s constitutional powers.

This decision shields Hunter from potential prison time as Biden nears the end of his presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

Good. I hope the democrats play just as dirty and hard as the republicans going forward. We cannot be civil with barbarians.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 60 points 3 weeks ago

I would also like them to do that too, but I would prefer they do it for something other than nepotism.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The left needs a populist movement like Bernie Sanders has been saying, the movements the left has seen prior to this point have tapered out because they didn’t get money backed support, and because they didn’t capture the hearts and mind of the comfortable democrat voter.

It’s had been an uphill battle till now, but maybe things will be different going forward because the republicans are going to peel back a lot of hard won rights and freedoms, and also degrade quality of life and standards of living with their health, economic and education policies.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

...I don't disagree, but I'm struggling to see how this is related to my comment. Are you replying to the right person?

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh thanks, don’t recall which one I was replying to

[-] squid_slime@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago

Its not exactly revolutionary action, him pardoning his son is no win for the working class

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

him pardoning his son is no win for the working class

Who cares?

Anyone who has bothered to do their homework knows the Democrat party votes in favor of the working class WAY more often than Republicans. Hell, a few weeks before the election Trump and Musk did a televised interview where they jerked each other off about how much they hate unions and worker rights. Then working Americans voted them into power.

Now stupid Americans are going to get the corruption they deserve.

[-] squid_slime@lemm.ee -4 points 3 weeks ago

This is whataboutism, I am for neither blue or red, I hope they both burn. The only group I care for is the working class hense I care about nepotism within the political class.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

The only group I care for is the working class

Then I'm sure you've done your homework and found out that Democrats historically vote in favor of the working class WAY more than Republicans, so you should vote Democrat if you care about the working class.

Because I promise you, a 3rd party isn't viable in the United States, so your options are Democrat or Republican.

Not that you may have that option anymore going forward.

[-] squid_slime@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm a revolutionary socialist. I give no fucks to what little bread crumbs the dems brush off of the table. We have seen "democratic" politics play out, the centrist shift to the right.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee -2 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck that. Playing dirty in this instance does zilch to help you. Why the fuck would you support this? How does Hunter Biden being pardoned help you or anyone else at all? Democrats are okay to play dirty when it is done defending basic rights for Americans, not for the political elite. Hunter is a grifter and he should absolutely face the consequences.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Why the fuck would you support this?

Because I'm tired of watching the Dems be held to a higher standard and taking the high road and honoring decorum and losing to a corrupt as fuck party of traitors.

Americans voted for corruption, so now they're going to get it. Hopefully we get so fucking corrupt it actually makes us act like adults and vote more intelligently. Doubt it. We're probably done for. But that's our own fault.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Again, I'm perfectly fine with Democrats playing dirty when it helps the country as a whole. They want to gerrymander to hell to get something like socialized health insurance passed or something like ranked choice voting? Have at it. This is just nepotism. It doesn't help you. It doesn't help the Democratic Party. Nobody should be for this.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

This is just nepotism. It doesn’t help you.

Nepotism is standard in America. We don't care enough to actually do anything about it. In fact, we just voted to make it worse. I'm aware it doesn't help me. It helps a guy who was a solid president who doesn't want his son to be in prison for non-violent crimes while a criminal president who openly stated he will target his political opponents sits in the Oval Office. Can't blame him in the least. Especially since most presidents pardon people who support them at the end of their term. It's normal in America.

If we didn't like it, we could vote more intelligently. But we don't, and we won't.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

30% of eligible voters elected Trump, Democrats are allowed now to do what they want. Okie-dokie.

Continue on with your "they took the high road" loss analysis. It's been said so many times I don't think anyone even knows what the "high road" is. If you could explain it to me I might be better informed.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I mean, I agreed already that this action isn’t a win for voters. I am just sick of people crying about Biden doing this selfish thing for his family when Republicans are literally supporting white supremacy. There’s too much money support for the white supremacy movement, the left it needs own comparable financing against this.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

How does this combat that? Does this bring in funding to do that? It absolutely does not.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl -5 points 3 weeks ago

But then the Democrats will BECOME the barbarians. Do not stoop to the level of sloppy populism -- behave honorably and it will pay off in the long-term.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

behave honorably and it will pay off in the long-term.

.........HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

behave honorably and it will pay off in the long-term.

We found out in 2024 that is not true. Voters are perfectly willing to vote for the most dishonorable candidate ever to run for office.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 0 points 3 weeks ago

2024 is not long term. This is not the last election.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Taking the "high road" WAS the Dems long term plan. It failed. Doesn't work.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 0 points 3 weeks ago

It failed in the short term. We still have the whole remainder of USA history (whatever that ends up being). Despite what parties will have you believe, there is a life outside of the run up to the election and inauguration. There is also a Democrat presence at lower levels, for example, in the state and county contexts. I would prefer it if the whole world doesn't rush to emulate Trump in their approach to the world, as I don't think it's the best long term plan for our country.

Faith in promises made by presidents is at an all time low and I don't think we need to do more to further degrade that.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
742 points (97.9% liked)

News

23659 readers
2908 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS