664
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by nuke@sh.itjust.works to c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 153 points 3 weeks ago

i mean military just showed up, did absolute minimum just so that they can't be prosecuted for refusing orders, and when parliament voted martial law away some of them left (before being ordered so) then the rest left anyway. they knew what was going on and didn't want part in this

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, conscription sucks etc etc, but this is why you want it. You *try* to make it so that the average citizen is represented throughout the military so that it's not just one group of gung ho violent dickheads that self select for abuse of power.

Also, it means the guy in the crowd can also put up against that kind of bullshit as a civillian.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 weeks ago

political power grows out of barrel of a gun like they say few borders north. it does make sense to make everyone participate, but it's always a tradeoff

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

Conscription is slavery.

What you want is to revitalize the concept of the citizen-soldier.

The problem with that as applied to a modern society instead of like, ancient Mediterranean cultures is that we just don't need that many soldiers anymore.

Yet...

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago

Conscription is slavery.

Hardly. They're paid. There are exemptions for medical conditions and other things (I think medical students get exempted, and some choose to serve with the police, instead.) It's not a perfect system by any stretch, but it's not slavery.

That said, I'm against it overall. There are more and more rich kids "mysteriously" getting exempted. You're expected to join by the age of 22, which interrupts university for many. And, it promotes a huge boy's club where they learn to smoke and drink and preserve the patriarchy. It's created a large gender divide where many young men are upset women are finally starting to get something closer to equal treatment (still not equal by any means) in the workplace here, but men are still expected to serve their time while women finish their higher educations and get a head start in the workplace. Honestly, if they're going to have mandatory military service, they should just make it mandatory for women, too.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

1: If you force someone into labor with the threat of violence or punishment, it's slavery, and you're at best arguing about semantics and adding extra steps.

2: There are plenty of slavery systems that pay slaves nominal wages, especially slave soldiers. The most famous historical example is probably the janissaries:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janissary

3: There's probably an argument to be made about how it's just a social need when you're at war or have an aggressive neighbor but the problem is ultimately that the society hasn't created a system where the citizens actually like the state enough to volunteer.

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

force

Is a loaded term. They are not making anyone who is physically or mentally unable in any way to do it. They are compensating those who do do it. (Yes, the pay is bad.) They get ample vacation time. There are many ways to postpone it or to replace it with some other form of public service. Many (most?) Koreans see it as their civic duty. It's not so different from paying taxes or attending public school. Are those things slavery? We live in a society...

[-] nuke@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

we just don't need that many soldiers anymore.

I know we're being noncredible but damn

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The classical republics expected literally every male citizen to train regularly and purchase at least some of their own arms and equipment as part of it, with wealthier citizens supplying more expensive material for everyone, aka, the well regulated militia.

Non-crediblenessousity aside I don't think America needs 175 million soldiers.

You can argue that "citizens" wasn't as inclusive then as we expect it to mean now but that's still a hell of people unless a cool war starts again.

[-] nuke@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not America, no. But I see the benefit of conscription with turds like North Korea on your border.

America needs 175 million soldiers

I came violently upon seeing these words and wasn't able to read the surrounding text.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

disqualified from service for gooning about the service

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Are you saying you don't want 175M American soldiers? Get outta here with that...

More guns = better. Come get some Canada, we're ready this time.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
664 points (99.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6790 readers
701 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS