365

Coca-Cola has been accused of quietly abandoning a pledge to achieve a 25% reusable packaging target by 2030 in what campaigners call a “masterclass in greenwashing”.

The company has been previously found by researchers to be among the world’s most polluting brands when it comes to plastic waste.

In 2022, the company made a promise to have 25% of its drinks sold in refillable or returnable glass or plastic bottles, or in refillable containers that could be filled up at fountains or “Coca-Cola freestyle dispensers”.

But shortly before this year’s global plastics summit, the company deleted the page on its website outlining this promise, and it no longer has a target for reusable packaging.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] myplacedk@lemmy.world 38 points 3 weeks ago

Here is in Denmark they are at 100%, because that's our law. As far as I know (as a consumer), it works just fine.

All soda bottles and cans can be returned in (almost?) any store that sells them. When we buy, a small deposit is added. When we return the container, we get the deposit back.

The deposit is adjusted every now and then to keep it small enough to not significantly affect customers buying power, but big enough that most people want the money back.

[-] ms_lane@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Where aren't they close to that?

In Australia they were at 70:30 Recycled:Virgin PET, 30 years ago when I toured the plant, all of their water products are 100% now (but they're pretty flimsy, not sure the mount franklin bottles would hold up under 'shaken up coca coca' pressures)

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

In 2022, the company made a promise to have 25% of its drinks sold in refillable or returnable glass or plastic bottles, or in refillable containers that could be filled up at fountains or “Coca-Cola freestyle dispensers”.

It's reusable, not recyclable that is the pledge. While recyclable is good, reusable is better.

Denmark doesn't have any laws making it reusable only.

[-] myplacedk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yes, that is an important distinction. Although for now, I'd say recycling instead of trashing is a big improvement. Especially if the trash ends up in nature.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
365 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39387 readers
2304 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS