Collapse

683 readers

35 users here now

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.

Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.

RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort, high volume and low relevance posts.

Related lemmys:

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

eleitl@lemm.ee

maketotaldestr0i@lemm.ee

eris@lemm.ee

172

Yes, Climate Change Is Probably Going To Kill You (predicament.substack.com)

submitted 3 months ago by florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/collapse@lemm.ee

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] troed@fedia.io -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's your choice to hold opinions over scientific consensus.

It's known as climate science denial.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What? You literaly poster an opinion peace. By a climate scientist, yes, but so is the response I posted.

Plus, I quoted a study in reply to the comments about the IPCC.

How is that climate science denial?

[–] troed@fedia.io -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The scientific consensus is in the IPCC reports.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And it is science denial to have a scientific opinion that is interpreting facts differently then the consensus?

Also, from my first source:

"The IPCC supports the overwhelming scientific consensus about human impact on climate change, so we would expect the reports' vocabulary to be dominated by greater certainty on the state of climate science -- but this is not the case."

The IPCC assigns a level of certainty to climate findings using five categories of confidence and ten categories of probability. The team found the categories of intermediate certainty predominated, with those of highest certainty barely reaching 8% of the climate findings evaluated.

"The accumulation of uncertainty across all elements of the climate-change complexity means that the IPCC tends to be conservative," says co-author Professor Corey Bradshaw, Matthew Flinders Fellow in Global Ecology at Flinders University. "The certainty is in reality much higher than even the IPCC implies, and the threats are much worse."