398
submitted 2 weeks ago by Moonrise2473@feddit.it to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

In my (European) country now we can have a digital copy of the driving license on the phone. It specifically says that it's valid to be presented to law enforcement officers during a check.

I saw amazed in the beginning. They went from limited beta testing to full scale nationwide launch in just two months. Unbelievable. And I even thought "wow this is so convenient I won't need to take the wallet with me anymore". I installed the government app and signed up with my government id and I got my digital driving license.

Then yesterday I got stopped by a random roadblock check and police asked me my id card. I was eager to immediately try the new app and show them the digital version, but then because music was playing via Bluetooth and I didn't want to pause it, i just gave the real one.

They took it and went back to their patrol for a full five minutes while they were doing background checks on me.

That means if I used the digital version, they would had unlimited access to all my digital life. Photos, emails, chats, from decades ago.

What are you are going to do, you expect that they just scan the qr code on the window, but they take the phone from your hand. Are you going to complain raising doubts? Or even say "wait I pin the app with a lock so you can't see the content?"

"I have nothing to hide" but surely when searching for some keywords something is going to pop-up. Maybe you did some ironic statement and now they want to know more about that.

And this is a godsend for the secret services. They no longer need to buy zero day exploits for infecting their targets, they can just cosplay as a patrol and have the victim hand the unlocked phone, for easy malware installation

Immediately uninstalled the government app, went back to traditional documents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Why is nobody mentioning that by installing it and authenticating, there is sweet fuck all you can do to stop them tracking your movements and downloading your whole address book so they can see who you Associate with?

Taking the phone isn't the problem if they are already in it.

[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 19 points 2 weeks ago

You have to explicitly allow that, at least on android. However, most people hit allow and don't think anyways :/

[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh nice, no contacts or internal storage stuff!

[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

There are camera and location permissions listed. AFAIK my ID card doesn't have those.

[-] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Camera also means microphone access.

[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think that might just be to scan qr codes. And unless you've got a very shitty phone, that camera can't run without the app being active.

You do close your apps, right?

[-] stetech@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

iOS too. Permissions can even be given only while the app is active if it “requires” them, or for location for example an approximate one is sufficient.

[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, but there was some news about that recently. Apparently their security doesn't quite work as it should. Perhaps that's been fixed by now, but then again, Apple does not have a great reputation there.

[-] EarJava@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

In most phones it is possible to set permissions (to contacts, locaton, etc) for every app.

[-] bokherif@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, I wouldn't worry about all the comments discussed here. Mainly because the governments already have access to everything and I mean EVERYTHING. They will get a subpoena in under a minute if they want to check something regarding your digital life. Not condoning it, just a fact of present life.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Mainly because the governments already have access to everything and I mean EVERYTHING.

There's limits, largely around the speed and accuracy by which data can be ingested and processed. You can look for everyone somewhere sometimes and someone everywhere sometimes and someone somewhere at any time, but it takes a ton of digital resources to monitor everyone everywhere all the time. For the data to be meaningful it has to be interpreted.

Manned checkpoints allow local state actors to make decisions in near-real time relative to immediately present information. The classic example is someone with a stale warrant or notice on their record. The sheer volume of delinquents makes pursuing every individual troublesome, but as soon as a known offender steps across a checkpoint the police can pounce on the individual offender in that instance. If you've got a five year old traffic ticket, a police officer can be in your face about it as soon as they run your ID.

[-] brian@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

fwiw, my state's mobile id app doesn't even ask for the location permission. so maybe some, but it's not universal

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
398 points (92.7% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
248 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS