this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
30 points (89.5% liked)

World News

1078 readers
408 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The leader of the centre-right opposition party the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) was roundly criticised for the ostentatious arrival, both for flaunting his wealth and ignoring concerns over the climate crisis. Far from being chastened, however, Merz doubled down.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StraponStratos 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)
[–] Hubi@feddit.org 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"The last government had to enact some changes after 16 years of CDU stagnation and that was pretty uncomfortable, so we're going to elect the CDU again to keep everything the way it was"

Spoiler: It will not remain the way it was because the world keeps changing.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 10 points 4 months ago

Standing still while everyone else is moving forward is called falling behind, which Germany did for 16 years with the Christians.

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Well .. not at all except for blaming "green policies" for literally every issue in existence. Corrupt Nazi politicians, somehow the green parties fault .. ECT.

I really hope the worst Nazis and most Corrupt conservatives form an alliance and fuck their voters badly. They deserve a lesson.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The conservatives make Germany stop using nuclear power? Also the greens fault.

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 6 points 4 months ago

Happened exactly like this u ironically XD

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Technically it was both of them. Quitting nuclear power was decided by a red/green government in 2000. Mind you, they actually had some decent arguments back then; our reactors were approaching their operational limits and extensions were becoming increasingly uneconomical. The nuclear phase-out was expected to take until late 2024.

In 2010 a conservative/liberal government decided to put the nuclear exit on hold for 8 to 14 years (depending on the age of the reactor), then reverted their stance after the Fukushima nuclear incident in 2011. The nuclear exit was completed in spring of 2023.

A notable difference between the parties was that the red/green plan was designed to let the reactors "run out". Germany was contractually obligated to buy a certain amount of power from each power plant and these contracts would be allowed to finish without being renewed. The conservative plan instead set a hard time limit, leading to a series of lawsuits as the plants were shut down before they could deliver the agreed amount of power. That little stunt cost us about two and a half billion Euros.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 5 points 4 months ago

Technically the nuclear debate goes back to Kohl already, because of how old the reactors were. Also, the Greens had a tiny percentage in the SPD led government back then and were not planning on using coal as substitute, like the Union eventually did, but to increase renewables. The Union eventually also killed our solar industry and all their jobs, while they saved & campaigned about the jobs of coal miners. It's just an unfunny joke at this point.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 4 months ago

I'm German. I'm thinking:

"Holy shit, not this guy!"

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

"We can shoot ourselves in the foot too!"