398

(i lied)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social -1 points 4 days ago

"Depending on how you define mruder, there are hundreds of murders happening every day. What's one more? gunshot" --you

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

You seem eager to jump to conclusions while putting no thought into them. Why don't you share your moral philosophy opinion with the class?

When, in your opinion, is it right and proper for someone to kill someone else?

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social -1 points 3 days ago

When given due process of law, convicted by a jury of peers, and when it becomes obvious there really is no other way. That's justice. One guy with a gun is just a murderer.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Curious, so you believe in the cases where the US, or its respective states execute a prisoner that it is warranted because there's no other way?

I could go ahead, as you did to me, and assert you're a monster, but instead I'll give you a chance to elaborate.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

Apologies. Thank you for showing me the error of my ways. Summary execution, I now realize, is never acceptable. If Hitler hadn't killed himself, he would have deserved life in supermax, not the electric chair. Deliberately ending a life is simply inhumane.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I take by your sarcasm you don't want a real conversation?

But yes, only not ironically. I don't think a state should kill anyone for sake of retribution, no matter how grisly their behavior. In fact, I think retribution shouldn't factor at all into how a state manages those who break law or engage in antisocial behavior.

Is that a conversation you want to have? Or is snark the only thing you know how to do?

ETA: It sounds like you may not know this: Summary execution is killing someone without due process. Generally, that's a crime internationally, and regarded as a war crime.

I assume you would want Hitler to at least have a trial at Nuremberg, if he was captured, but feel free to correct me.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I don’t think a state should kill anyone for sake of retribution

That's funny. Just a couple replies ago you were actively advocating for murder. Is it only bad when the state does it?

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 38 minutes ago

I think you misread what I said.

Care to state your case?

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
398 points (98.3% liked)

196

16689 readers
2488 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS