87
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
87 points (92.2% liked)
PC Gaming
8784 readers
381 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The thing is, the Assassins Creed series doesn't have its roots in RPG gameplay. They've shoehorned it in in later games, but it's always felt surface-level and cheap. Going back to telling a definitive story, in which you as the player enact the action, is a good thing in my opinion.
I'd say the idea was that certain events have happened in history. Broad strokes are known. But you're running the simulation to find out the details. And that's where the game happens. Reach the objective, whatever way, or fail. Much like any other game.
That may be some way away from a sandbox game but it's worlds away from watching a movie.
But on rails games like Drakes Whatever? I'd watch the movie if it wasn't annoying and full of obnoxious characters and bad script.
This really isn't very representative of early Assassins Creed. It's generally been chock full of very specific instructions - some mandatory, some optional for partial synchronicity -- "Don't alert the guards", "You have 90 seconds", "Use smoke bombs 5 times", etc.