253
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. And it's horrible! And we should have done more!

We should -- like I said -- have stripped property from the slaveowners. They surrendered unconditionally! The North could have done with them as it liked.

It should have confiscated the property of everyone who profited from slavery prior to the war, and given that property to the slaves. And yes, the North should have killed as many people (be they slaveowners or bootlickers) as was necessary to carry out that transfer of property.

Station troops on the plantations. Shoot everyone who shows up with torches to burn them down and deprive former slaves of their newfound wealth.

But what I'm trying to say is: no more than that number. No more killing than is absolutely necessary to achieve that goal.

We should be imagining Jeff Bezos in prison, not dead. You don't want to make allies out of the people who want him dead. Those people are not good friends.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

How do you think Jim Crow was established? With violence.

It was not simply due to congressional reconstruction that programmatic land reform wasn’t attempted in the south. People were actively pursuing campaigns of violence during reconstruction.

There was no alternative to violent resistance.

There is no alternative to violent resistance.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
253 points (98.8% liked)

196

16617 readers
2263 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS