187
submitted 8 hours ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/usa@midwest.social

In the face of ‘eradication’, one trans activist is preparing to fight – and she’s sick of silence and neglect from her supposed allies. Raquel Willis tells Io Dodds why Republican bathroom bans are everybody’s problem

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You’re claiming the Democratic Party hasn’t supported the trans community?

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

They really haven't. They tend to take a neutral stance at best, rather than positively affirming trans rights. This was one of the things that killed them in the election. Despite being a decade in to the recent Republican war on trans people, Democrats have never bothered to develop a set of coherent talking points that they can defend trans rights around. When was the last time you heard a centrist Democrat say, "trans women are women, trans men are men. Their healthcare is medically necessary and life-saving. Trans women belong in women's restrooms and trans men in men's. Republicans are currently guilty of attempting a genocide."

That's the kind of talking points they should be using, a full-throated defense of trans rights that can directly stand up against Republican hate mongering. Instead, if they respond at all, they respond in a pathetic mincing way that tries to "both sides" the issue. Instead of vocally coming down firmly on the side of trans rights, they'll say things like, "these are complex issues...." or "these issues are a distraction..." You would never see a Democrat say that antisemitism is "a distraction" or that defending abortion rights "are a complex issue."

With some notable exceptions, Democrats have completely failed to actually have strong support for trans rights. Republicans are anti-trans and pro-trans genocide. Democrats are neutral. And this really hurt them in the election. Republicans supported full trans elimination. And Democrats could only respond with non-committal mealy-mouthed mumbling about the complexity of the issue. Voters saw that they really didn't stand for anything. Kamala didn't really believe in anything when it comes to trans rights, and the voters punished her for it. Voters want people who actually believe in something, not an empty suit that is just following polls and focus groups.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

The fact of the matter is the majority of America doesn’t treat trans people properly. So to win elections they need the support of people that don’t treat trans people properly.

I hope that support for the trans community will continue to improve over time. But democrats need votes from more than just the trans community and allies to take power back from the GOP.

[-] gift_of_gab@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

So to win elections they need the support of people that don’t treat trans people properly.

They don't though, because they're never going to get that voter either way.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Why would you assume this? There are already voters of all types voting for both parties.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
187 points (92.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1998 readers
1038 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS