439
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
439 points (94.2% liked)
Electric Vehicles
462 readers
903 users here now
Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.
Related communities:
- !energy@slrpnk.net
- BYD
- !teslamotors@lemmy.zip
- !rivian@lemmy.zip
- !polestar@lemmy.ca
- !micromobility@lemmy.world
- !avs@futurology.today
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
The size isn't a branding thing. It's a US legal thing.
Since 2012, the CAFE (fuel economy) standards have been based on vehicle footprint, not classification. It's why 2011 was the last year model of the S10, Dakota, and Ranger.
As the CAFE standards get stricter and stricter, the auto companies have to make cargo vehicle footprints larger and larger. It's why when the Ranger was relaunched, it was bigger than the 2010 F150.
It's also why the small cargo van class of vehicle stopped existing in the last few years. The Transit Connect, Ram ProMaster City, and Nissan NV200 were all just discontinued because they can't make a cargo van with that footprint that meets the new CAFE regulations.
It's also why the Maverick has the hard-to-buy hybrid listed as the "standard" model with the traditional engine as the "upgrade."
Making the vehicles electric will allow them to start making them reasonably-sized again. Right now, the frame of the F150 is really large, and after the Mustang Mach E fiasco, Ford is scared to use a different chassis for the electric truck.
Give it a few generations, and it'll be perfect. In the meantime, the Lightning is still way better than the Cybertruck at almost everything, better than the Rivian for hauling things, and way cheaper than both.