this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
838 points (98.8% liked)

Memes

50172 readers
1058 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HikingVet 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know about the states, but here in Canada the government takes the position "ignorance of the law is not a defence".

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're not being ignorant of the law - you're being ignorant of the weird computer square printed on the shirt you thrifted

[–] HikingVet 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Claiming you didn't know it could cause harm isn't a defense in court in Canada.

Anymore bullshit?

[–] LibreMonk@linkage.ds8.zone 1 points 21 hours ago

“Malice” implies intent. Accidents are not malicious. Neglect in the worst case. So certainly any charges could not be based on malice.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Christ you're a cordial fellow

I was, I thought quite clearly, having a joking poke. Obviously "didn't know lol" isn't a defense.

[–] LibreMonk@linkage.ds8.zone 1 points 21 hours ago

Consider florida, where if you are caught with shrooms that are wet, freshly picked, they cannot convict you for carrying contraband because you do not necessarily know what you picked.

Laws are often based on intent. In some cases, penalties vary depending on intent. It would be an unacceptably brutally harsh law to judge someone under a presumption of harmful intent for something they might have no awareness of.

QR codes can have icons on them. Certainly if I created such a t-shirt, I would put some cool looking icon in the center of it. Someone being dragged through the system might argue “i did not know that qr code was real.. i just liked the cat in the middle of it”.