this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
103 points (98.1% liked)

technology

23514 readers
419 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Des@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

While it probalbly wouldn't go full Kessler, remember that high velocity impacts can create showers of debris, of ~~which some will be boosted to higher orbits from the new velocity gained from the impactor.~~

(nm won't be a new stable orbit it will just be highly elipitcal and still interface with the atmosphere. there would have to be a second impact at apogee to actually boost the orbit)

Ideal anti-sat weapon would boost itself up to rendezvous and dock with the starlink sat, then deorbit it with a one use solid booster. Could use grapplers or something cool like that.

Second best would be an unmanned vehicle with a directed energy weapon on it. Cause spalling which could deorbit or just damage the panels or communications.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

An orbit will always pass through the altitude of last impulse.

[–] knightly@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah, impacts might throw debris into more steeply elliptical orbits but unless another impact at apogee gives the debris more momentum then the average level of the orbit would remain the same.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you're right i completely forgot you have to circularize to actually create a new higher orbit it was way too late at night when i realized that

don't tell the other old timers on the kerbal space program forums i made this mistake

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

[Jeb saluting while grinning madly]