this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
140 points (82.4% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4232 readers
397 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah the explanation can't be true. It would take a single thread like 0 milliseconds to render the background image. That must be a shitpost.

That being said, I can imagine the first part being true due to some random windows fuckery

[โ€“] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Also the potential number of threads would be in the millions if you used the entire color pallette on your background (limited by your display resolution). Even if you aren't approaching that, surely most backgrounds have color values in at least the tens of thousands even with color compression. That just moves the bottleneck to your number of cores. Even the thread switching alone would have astronomically more overhead than just having one thread render the whole background.