this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
189 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38061 readers
329 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thousands of artists are urging the auction house Christie’s to cancel a sale of art created with artificial intelligence, claiming the technology behind the works is committing “mass theft”.

The Augmented Intelligence auction has been described by Christie’s as the first AI-dedicated sale by a major auctioneer and features 20 lots with prices ranging from $10,000 to $250,000 for works by artists including Refik Anadol and the late AI art pioneer Harold Cohen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Under this logic you should pay royalties to the maker of your brush and the teachers who taught you. Maybe not everything is about owning shit.

[–] LANCESTAAAA@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean typically you buy the brushes and pay for the teaching one way or the other. AI isn't paying any artist for training upon their work.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago

Who do you think has paid artists throughout history?

(Patrons is the answer)