this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
1679 points (88.1% liked)

Technology

61456 readers
4074 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
1679
Why you shouldn't use Brave Browser (www.spacebar.news)
submitted 2 years ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
816 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] tate 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The more market share chrome based browsers have, the easier it is for google to inflict their agenda for the internet on everyone. If firefox didnt exist, every web developer would be optimizing their sites only for chrome, and responding quickly to any change google wants to make.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It really doesn't matter what Firefox'es codebase is though. To a web developer it's a black box. It may as well be a bowl of COBOL spaghetti. So long as enough people use it and it behaves differently to a web developer than Google's Chromium or Chrome, the goal you mentioned is achieved. This is why I don't buy this argument. If Firefox'es black box is as compatible, as fast or faster and as good or better than Chrome's, more users will use it than if it isn't.