this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
9 points (80.0% liked)

Futurology

2264 readers
668 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
voidx@futurology.today
Lugh@futurology.today
Espiritdescali@futurology.today
AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today
9
AI Scientist Passes Peer Review for First Time (sakana.ai)
submitted 13 hours ago by BaylorSwift3@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] regrub@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Peer review for a workshop at an AI conference. Seems like one big circlejerk.

Lmk when it happens for a major journal that isn't Elsevier

Edit: what are the implications when an "AI scientist" has to eventually retract a paper due to inaccuracies/hallucinations? Who will be ultimately held accountable? This issue seems like one big ethical gray area.