this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
1067 points (99.3% liked)

Good News Everyone

1419 readers
62 users here now

A place to post good news and prevent doom scrolling!

Rules for now:

  1. posts must link from a reliable news source
  2. no reposts
  3. paywalled articles must be made available
  4. avoid politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the main ethical pathway to billions is through intellectual property. Write a beloved book series where each installment sells over 10 million copies, gets adapted into a movie cinematic universe that grosses billions, sells a shitload of merchandise, etc., and taking a fair cut of all that economic activity might result in a billion dollars.

Yes, in a sense it's still rent seeking of being paid some kind of toll for someone else building on your work, but that foundation is still your own work.

On a smaller scale, you've got songwriters, filmmakers, other entertainers, who can do one thing that gets seen/appreciated by billions. Same with inventors or artists.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

fair point, for creative stuff whether or not its worth is really billions is another discussion which might touch ethics but is not always an obv violation.

It can really be a grey zone though since some inventions could really improve humanity as a whole (such as those in medicine) but when capitalised becomes accessible only by a certain class and makes the inventor possibly a billionaire. Now if you categorize earning billions from this as non-ethical but earning billions from other creative processes as ethical this will likely create a loophole. So I am still in favor of putting these in the same bag.