this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3610 readers
99 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

That was the last government I think, wait which one do we have now it's all blended together a bit

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Red Tories, Blue Tories. All the same.

Just. Increase. Tax. On. The. Rich.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

There are two sides of this coin.

Should the rich be taxed more? Absolutely. I would personally introduce tax which keeps raising by 10% every 100k, up to 90% - irrespectively of the source of earnings so no "capital gains" gateway.

Are some people taking the piss with benefits claims? Also absolutely yes. There was an article few weeks ago, I think in the Guardian where I think 4 benefits claimants told their stories. First one was a lady in her 50' which used to work for a council and stopped working 30 years ago, in 90' due to "anxiety and depression" and was never working since, relying on taxpayers - this is taking the piss.

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

Even if all claims of benefit fraud were true - would it matter? You always expect some free loading on any system. I mean have you ever had a friend who doesn't get the rounds in, why do you keep them around? I imagine its because you value them in some other way. The benefit fraud bill is low compared to the billions sitting about in tax havens and in property.

fine they might take the piss but its ultimately better that the system is there and the money is available in a dignified way. Do you really think getting those people back to work would be helpful to the economy? They aren't exactly going to be motivated are they? Or are you more concerned with punishment? Because that's a different matter altogether

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)