1237

Sherri Tenpenny is no longer a licensed physician after airing fringe comments and ducking investigators.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tal@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It sounds like she may be a scam artist rather than an idiot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherri_Tenpenny

she is the author of four books opposing vaccination

Tenpenny promotes anti-vaccination videos sold by Ty and Charlene Bollinger and receives a commission whenever her referrals result in a sale, a practice known as affiliate marketing.

If you look at her website, the front page is mostly selling her books and various snake oil treatments, like "heavy metal detox" substances. looks further And what appears to be faith healing stuff.

Getting a medical degree doesn't mean that you can't be a scam artist.

[-] Scooter@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

In a June 2021 report on the Disinformation Dozen, titled "Pandemic Profiteers," the CCDH estimated that Tenpenny earned up to $353,925 from a single webinar titled "How Covid-19 Injections Can Make You Sick ... Even Kill You."

This income is on top of sales from Tenpenny's pre-recorded training courses, her line of supplements, as well as her fees for appearing in multiple vaccine-injury cases. And each webinar produces more customers.

"My job is to teach the 400 of you in the class … so each one of you go out and teach 1,000," she told her $623-a-head "Mastering Vaccine Info Boot Camp" in March, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reported.

https://www.businessinsider.com/sherri-tenpenny-how-anti-vaxxer-fuels-pandemic-makes-money-2021-8

[-] tal@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, that too.

Honestly, one thing that I've found to be surprisingly consistent across a lot of the apparently-bonkers-on-the-surface conspiracy crowd is that someone is selling "alternative wellness" products at the bottom of it.

I remember discovering that Alex Jones was off selling a bunch of "alternative wellness" stuff too and saying "oooohhhh, okay, that makes more sense".

I think that the business model looks something like this. You take some issue that someone doesn't like. I don't know, being told to wear a mask. You say "this is unnecessary". Okay, fine, that's something of a values call, weighting risks against benefits. Then you promote related stuff that they agree with. So, okay, say someone goes to church, and they pray for someone to get better, and that's a normal part of the culture, right? But in the case of Sherri Tenpenny, it looks like she's off encouraging people to perform prayers that include a lot of the other kinda wonky products she's promoting. She's trying to leverage the cultural norm of praying for someone to get better to associating the stuff she's promoting with getting better.

So you put out stuff that people agree with to draw them in. Do a wide range of things targeting sometimes-totally-different groups. Some people don't like 5G -- that's not new with 5G, as there have always been people worried about the health effects of cell phones and radios. Some people don't trust vaccines. Some people don't like being told what to do and don't like being made to wear masks. Some people are pissed off with overseas competition for the field they work in, so opposition to global trade goes over well. Some people are concerned about the effects that industrial chemicals might be having on their bodies. Some people have the idea that there are some sort of ties between life or biological processes and magnets (though that tended to be more of a left-wing than a right-wing thing in the US in the past, but I suppose the same mechanisms work on people either way). I mean, run down the list, doesn't need to have much to do with each other. You're just trying to pick up people who don't agree with the mainstream on one point or another, so that you look appealing to them on that point. You're saying something that the mainstream isn't that they like.

You keep constantly promoting communication channels you run. In Sherri Tenpenny's case, she's promoting a ton of podcasts and newsletters and mailing lists. The near-term aim is to get an audience subscribed to those channels, so that you can have as many shots as possible as putting a sales pitch for your products in front of them. The long-term aim is to ultimately use those channels to shift as many as possible onto regularly buying whatever snake oil you're peddling.

And that explains why you have some weird agglomerations of different views. I mean, she's talking about chemicals, 5G, anti-vaccines, magnetism, faith healing...it seems incredibly unlikely for someone to have honestly picked up all of those highly-abnormal views and also have honestly come to the conclusion that they are an expert on them. But, if your goal is to just try to do a broad shotgun marketing blast towards anyone who might be upset with the mainstream in any sense and hook them in, you're just looking to convert anyone you can get to following and listening to you.

The final goal is to use those communication channels you've established with them to get them sending you money for whatever product you're trying to sell. "Alternative wellness" products are hard for the end user to evaluate the efficacy of, and you can mark them up to whatever, so snake oil makes for a good fit.

It's not that people like Sherri Tenpenny are idiots and believe what they're saying. It's that they're trying to perform a scam, and the collection of conspiracy or at least outside-the-mainstream ideas are "hooks" to try to draw people into the channel used to sell the scam.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's a long ass con.

Yikes.

I wonder how many people like this go under the radar, but saying stuff about COVID definitely brings attention.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
1237 points (98.5% liked)

News

23422 readers
3575 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS