cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/28232681
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
1365 points (89.4% liked)
Comic Strips
16161 readers
1777 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Human artists train using other artists work. Every avenue of human endeavour is based on what came before.
My own default style shares similarities with Barbara Canepa and Rumiko Takahashi. Why? Because, as a teen, I used to copy their stuff, trying to "unlock" the parts of it that I like.
If I was to directly copy an image, and say it was my own, then that crosses over into stealing. But that's not what has happened here. And unless you get very specific with the prompts, it's not likely to happen.
Okay, but did you literally illegally download the material in the first place? Did you violate licenses that you obtained the material under? Do you intentionally imitate specific artists so that casual observers can't tell the difference and then fill the entire space with more shitty art using that style than any human artist could ever product, such that the original artist who developed it no longer has control over that style and has their future income devastated?
It's not the same thing and you'd have to be willfully ignorant by this point to think that it is. All the major LLMs are "fruit of the poisonous tree." They were trained using stolen data that they were not entitled to use for those purposes. The artists SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID for their work training the AI.
What if I told you that I trained my brain on copyrighted materials that I pirated from the Internet? I make games and I have for sure downloaded games I didn't pay for and played them. I know I have used some of the mechanics from those games on my own. Am I a bad person?
What if I told you that you're not software? What an absurd comparison.
I would download a car. Sorry bro.
I don't agree with your take, sorry.
To say that an artist should have exclusive control over a style is dangerous.
Every time there is a big upheaval in an industry, it affects people's jobs in that sector. Henry Ford's investments in automation, put a lot of small car manufacturers in a tricky position. It also led to cars being affordable for most American households.
I'm not unsympathetic, in fact I'm more than a little aware that AI will be taking over my sector, the software development jobs, within a couple of years (and unlike art, I can't see any market for "hand-crafted" code!).
But, the genie can't be put back in the bottle. There's no possible positive that comes from "calling out" AI art whenever you see it. It doesn't help artists - if anything we've seen artists having to go out of their way proving their work isn't AI.
I think it'll be mainly using the AI to make the code, and then manually debugging it for a long while.
nobody fucking cares. find a different thread to bitch about your made up problem. GO AWAY.
You can't make me.
i can. it would just take some work.