Link to the archived Tweet
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
1288 points (98.3% liked)
People Twitter
6731 readers
2091 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I find this baffeling. Multiple people, on different topics did disagree with his campaigns promises, and voted for him against their best interest. (Farmers for exemple) Their justification ? "He won't do it". Are you telling me you are voting for someone who promises to do things, in the hope that he does all the other things but the one that would negatively impact you ? REALLY ?!
Literally yes. I recall there was a study (can't find it now) which showed that people who vote for extreme candidates often do so under the assumption that they won't actually follow through with their promises, and hence the vote is more about "sending a message." In some sense, it is a sick version of normalcy bias.
I always assume politicians won't keep the promises I like and will keep the promises I don't. Generally speaking, I've been pretty right about that.
That said, Trump did these tariffs in his last term, so I don't understand why anyone would think he wouldn't do it again.
Common clay of the new west and so on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYTQ7__NNDI
Couple of days ago there was a news item here in the Netherlands about a Dutch tulip grower. And his dad was wearing a MAGA hat. And this old man was saying that Trump was doing the right thing even though his business is negatively affected by Trump’s tariffs. Seriously, conservatives all have brain worms or something. Or they hate everyone else so much that they would gladly suffer to see other people get hurt.
Our agrarian sector is indeed not known for its progressive outlook, so I'm not surprised.
Currently nitrogen deposition is a big issue as it fucks up local plantlife. Their lobby has been downplaying this problem since it became known in the fucking 80's, hindering every political attempt to take action.
Now that the point has been reached where action needs to be taken they are all Pickachu-faced and shouting "how did this happen, it's the fault of the leftwing treehuggers". No, fuck the farming lobby in particular for kicking that can down the lane for 40 years.
Blissfully ignoring the consequences of adverse actions and acting as if nothing bad will come out of it is fully ingrained in their thought process.
But you see, America is the Greatest Country in the World™, and therefore anyone they elect as President can't be that bad. It doesn't matter if he repeatedly states how he absolutely will be that bad, he won't actually do the things he says he'll do because those things Can't Happen Here.