86
submitted 1 year ago by Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I'm keeping it broad by not specifying a distro. I'm just curious is this a real option for actual editing professionals? As far as I understand you can make it work by running under Wine, but I'm guessing this comes with significant drawbacks. I'm having trouble finding any information on both the current state of things with running Premiere under linux (most info seems to be from 2018 for some reason), and the extent of the drawbacks in a quantifiable way.

I'm generally a pretty happy Mac OS user, but I always want to keep options open. I haven't really tried to use Linux on desktop since the late 00s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vittelius@feddit.de 52 points 1 year ago

The reason, you aren't finding anything, is that nobody really attempts to install premiere or after effects anymore on Linux. The alternatives have cought up and they are available for Linux.

  • DaVinci Resolve provides the complete package. Video editor and (node based) compositor in one. Even outside of the Linux world there is a lot of momentum behind this tool, as I probably don't have to tell you. Keep in mind, that the free version on Linux has some limitations, that the free versions on the other OS's don't have (missing h264 support for example)
  • Left angle Autograph (https://www.left-angle.com/#page=95) is a young product, having seen its first release earlier this year. It's a direct competitor to After Effects. A timeline based VFX tool. Unfortunately fairly expensive as well.

Back to your question: making things work with wine has a significant drawback. Your system can break with every update. So you're not making it work just once but over and over again.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Is there any good alternative to Photoshop on Linux? That's about the only thing I miss after switching

There's GIMP but it seems a little clunky sometimes, I've heard krita is good for artists but I tend to just use this kind of thing for editing images

[-] paccio@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago
[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

As I mentioned krita isn't really an editing tool as far as I've heard it's more for art

I only ever really used it for editing

Paint.net used to be my go-to on windows because I'm too cheap to pay for a Photoshop license

[-] NaoPb@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't Krita more like an alternative to Adobe Illustrator?

[-] Vittelius@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Inkscape is like Illustrator. Krita is a digital painting application, so Photoshop. It doesn't replace Photoshop in every usecase. But in that regard it's better than the tool from Adobe (or so I've been told)

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
86 points (94.8% liked)

Linux

47223 readers
777 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS