this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
745 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

68723 readers
5057 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Schadrach 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

OK, so this is just the general anti-AI image generation argument where you believe any image generated is in some meaningful way a copy of every image analyzed to produce the statistical model that eventually generated it?

I'm surprised you're going the CSAM route with this and not just arguing that any AI generated sexually explicit image of a woman is nonconsensual porn of literally every woman who has ever posted a photo on social media.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, I am not saying that.

I'm saying if an AI image is sexual and seeded from irl child models, then it is CSAM.

Adult women who consensually post their image to social media are WAY different than children who can't consent to even enter a contract.

Also, I did argue that already when I mentioned how many AI porn models are directly seeded from Scarlett Johansson's face. Can you read?

[–] Schadrach 1 points 9 hours ago

To be clear, when you say "seeded from" you mean an image that was analyzed as part of building the image classifying statistical model that is then essentially running reverse to produce images, yes?

And you are arguing that every image analyzed to calculate the weights on that model is in a meaningful way contained in every image it generated?

I'm trying to nail down exactly what you mean when you say "seeded by."