89
submitted 1 year ago by hedge@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Proweruser@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

I mean it's slightly better. The worst effect is still by cloud seeding at flight height. That doesn't go away with hydrogen.

But to my understanding could even be turned into a beneficial effect otf you changed the flight height of planes, seeding clouds further down. But that makes them less efficient, which isn't great for hydrogen.

So a better strategy might be to mandate lower flight height and e/bio fuels.

[-] Angry_Badger@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

This is a great point and something I don't think many people are aware of. I believe I've heard a stat that states that only 50% the impact of planes on climate change is due to burning fossil fuels, whilst the other 50% is due to cloud seeding. (Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210525-how-aviation-is-reducing-its-climate-emissions).

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37573 readers
264 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS