22
Neo-Kautskyism: Exposing the Bernie/AOC “Fight Oligarchy” Tour de Farce
(www.blackagendareport.com)
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
There's a major contradiction between claiming (1) that Bernie was an "undeniable force" that Democrats had to job to defeat, and (2) claiming he's controlled opposition. People pick up on this, and it makes the "controlled opposition" theory sound even more conspiratorial. Saying Bernie functions as controlled opposition ("the purpose of a system is what it does") isn't much better, as the central claim -- that Bernie is controlled by the Democratic Party -- has a whole bunch of direct evidence against it and very little in support.
This is not a defense of Bernie; he's well short of what is needed today. But it's important to find out the best way to talk about him because of his historical role in shaping today's American left, and his current ability to draw large left-ish crowds.
Bernie -- like most people -- has certain lines he won't cross in order to win. One of his worst lines is his general support for U.S. foreign policy (including support of Israel), and he is also unwilling to risk splitting the Democratic Party. Within those lines he is (and was) actually trying to win. This is the way to talk about him. It's accurate (unlike "controlled opposition") and highlights that the lines a successful leftist politician will have to confront.