this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
915 points (98.7% liked)

politics

23167 readers
3297 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Yeah! Let's put Democrats in charge so they can do that!

[–] goferking0 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So they'll do something then unlike last time????

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

There haven't been 60 dems in the senate since 1979

There haven't been 50 dems since 2013

Starting living in this decade maybe

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The President has historically had wide latitude to act in times of emergency. The instigator of the insurrection should've been in Gitmo on January 21, 2021.

Sure, call me extremist, but look at where we are now. I'm fucking right. But, barring the correct action, Biden could've followed the moderate, decorous course of launching the prosecution that day. But no, it took TWO. GOD. DAMN. YEARS.

I'm so done with Democrat excuses.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

Biden had to preserve our beloved institutions so Trump would have something to tear down.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I think, in principle, the president persecuting his predecessor and current political rival is bad. Much simpler a solution is to not disrupt his criminal investigation by electing him president, but instead we're a country of assholes who can't even show up to the polls to keep him out.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Would it be worse than a fascist dictatorship?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You're asking if voting for Harris would have been worse than a fascist dictatorship?

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 0 points 18 hours ago

Really? This is an example why I'm done with Democrats.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think, in principle, the president persecuting his predecessor and current political rival is bad.

Holding a criminal accountable for the crimes they've committed is not persecution.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

The courts were responsible. Biden already expressed disappointment in the AG for being slow. This should never have been Biden's job to do, and it is our collective fault that he became president absolving himself of crimes.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

There haven’t been 60 dems in the senate since 1979

There haven’t been 50 dems since 2013

You're ignoring independents who caucus and vote with the dems. Your numbers are misleading on purpose. You're just making excuses for a party that opposes progressives and not republicans.

[–] goferking0 3 points 20 hours ago

Biden and doj did so much to stop trump while Biden was in office...

Starting living in this decade maybe

My man they're currently trying to be like Reagan republicans

load more comments (10 replies)