36
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
489 readers
508 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Honestly it's refreshing to see the mask of "non-partisan" judiciary finally fall away in some ways. The acceptance even among staunch libs that judges are absolutely partisan has been making it easier to have frank conversations with them. But idk, if you're not careful they can end up in "okay so we just have to make sure dems always win" just like in the other branches of govt which is not the point
Judges always have been partisan, but they often got away with it by finding causes/reasons based in seemingly neutral language. But in the last 18 years or so, the right wing judges have been pushing the boundaries of trying to be kayfabe non-partisan.
In the last decade, they aren’t even trying to hide it.
exactly. So libs getting over that denial makes agitating among them easier