this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
157 points (99.4% liked)

NZ Politics

721 readers
25 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (32 children)

However, that was the "time and place", after already attempting to handle it in their oppressor's preferred "time and place" they had to stand up and show how serious they were about opposing a new interpretation of law that would diminish their rights.

In NZ Parliament, everyone gets to speak, often heatedly and repeatedly, then everyone gets to vote. She wanted to stop others from voting. That’s a big no in a democracy. Fascist tactics like this have no place in a democracy. Had she been allowed to prevent a democratic vote, what do you think happens the next time a left wing party tries to pass something contentious? And just to be clear, these are the three principles in the Bill:

———————————————

Principle 1

The Executive Government of New Zealand has full power to govern, and the Parliament of New Zealand has full power to make laws,—

a) the best interests of everyone; and

b) in accordance with the rule of law and the maintenance of a free and democratic society.

Principle 2

The Crown recognises, and will respect and protect, the rights that hapū and iwi Māori had under the Treaty of Waitangi/te Tiriti o Waitangi at the time they signed it.

  1. The Crown recognises, and will respect and protect, the rights that hapū and iwi Māori had under the Treaty of Waitangi/te Tiriti o Waitangi at the time they signed it.

  2. However, if those rights differ from the rights of everyone, subclause (1) applies only if those rights are agreed in the settlement of a historical treaty claim under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975.

Principle 3

1) Everyone is equal before the law.

2) Everyone is entitled, without discrimination, to—

a) the equal protection and equal benefit of the law; and

b) the equal enjoyment of the same fundamental human rights

———————————————-

So this woman was literally protesting against the introduction of racial equality and equal human rights protections in New Zealand. Her party is racially supremacist, and believe that Maori are a genetically superior race.

In September 2020, Ikaroa-Rāwhiti candidate Heather Te Au-Skipworth released the party's sports policy which included establishing a national Māori sporting body and investing in Māori sporting scholarships and programs. She also stated "it is a known fact that Māori genetic makeup is stronger than others...”

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Lol fuck off. Writing down "actually we've unilaterally decided everyone is equal now" after decades of theft and oppression is not equality.

How rich to be accusing others of fascism when the party that pushes this is so strongly linked to facism and regression across the world.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago (20 children)

So what are you arguing for? More racial inequality? More structural racism? We overcome racism by stamping it out where we find it. We do not solve anything by making racism even worse. A most fundamental premise of any Western democracy is that we are all equal under the law, irrespective of our race. If you can’t agree on that then I suggest you take a long, hard look at your values.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You don't stamp out racism but just one sidedly declaring racism is over all of a sudden, having done nothing to address the actual harm that has been caused.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Actually you do stop racism by stopping racism. It’s really that simple. I’ve lost patience with racists. All racists think their racism is justified. It’s not.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Acknowledging past racism is not racism. Pretending past racism is fixed, despite not doing anything to actually fix it, is not fixing racism. It is perpetuating and entrenching racism.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No one claimed acknowledging past racism is racism. It’s the racism I’m claiming is racist. If you don’t support racial equality, you are racist.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes I agree, Act's bill was pretending to be racial equality, which it isn't, which is therefore racist. Glad we're on the same page

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Act’s bill was pretending to be racial equality, which it isn’t

I quoted the bill above and I'll do it again here because you seem to have an issue with reading comprehension:

Principle 3

  1. Everyone is equal before the law.
  2. Everyone is entitled, without discrimination, to— a) the equal protection and equal benefit of the law; and b) the equal enjoyment of the same fundamental human rights

The Bill literally, explicitly, an unequivocally calls for racial equality. There is no amount of Orwellian doublespeak you could possibly utter which could twist opposition to this as anything other than ugly racism.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nothing like Orwellian doublespeak than a bill that declares racism over "because I said so"

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The bill calls for racial equality. You oppose that. You are racist.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The bill did not call for racial equality, it declared there is already full and complete racial equality. If there are in fact ongoing inequalities, doing this locks them in and prevents them from being addressed. That is a big difference and is one of the reasons it was so widely opposed.

Laws are not some magic Harry Potter spell that immediately make things true because they're said a certain way. Youve either been taken in by this fantasy, in which case, grow up and learn something about the history of this country and how it still shapes us today, or you know what the grift is here and in which case, fuck you - you're a facist and a racist because it's always projection with you ghouls.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

equality, it declared there is already full and complete racial equality

No it doesn’t. Read it. It requires legal racial equality. If the only way for you to argue this is by pretending the bill says something it doesn’t, reconsider your premise.

[–] BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can't stop racism until you address the harm it's causing and punishing the people who are causing it. Without inflicting punishment on the people who are carrying out racism it will never stop.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can stop racism right this second, by not being racist. That’s it. All that is required is that you stop hating people because of their skin colour and treat them equally in law. That you would argue against that is horrifying.

[–] BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can stop racism right this second, by not being racist.

Oh wow. I didn't know it was that easy!. Just stop being racist!.

ll that is required is that you stop hating people because of their skin colour and treat them equally in law. That you would argue against that is horrifying.

No fuck that. The people who are racist and who did racist things MUST BE PUNISHED. If they get away with it then racism will never end. Saying that they should get away with all their racism is disgusting and you should be ashamed of saying such things.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh wow. I didn't know it was that easy!. Just stop being racist!.

What do you think racism is? From Cambridge Dictionary:

Noun: Policies, behaviours, rules, etc. that result in a continued unfair advantage to some people and unfair or harmful treatment of others based on race

So yes, it really is as easy as stop being racist. If you disagree, explain yourself, because right now you sound like a racial supremacist.

The people who are racist and who did racist things MUST BE PUNISHED. If they get away with it then racism will never end.

Cool, do that. In the mean time, STOP BEING A RACIST SHITHEAD.

Saying that they should get away with all their racism is disgusting

I didn’t write that. You just keep making shit up because your position is so fucking gross that you can’t stand to own it for even one comment.

[–] BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago

Cool, do that. In the mean time, STOP BEING A RACIST SHITHEAD.

We punish them first. Then we make them pay reparations for every harm they causes. Once that's all done we can talk. Until then fuck off.

I didn’t write that.

Yes you did. That's what this bill for designed to do. It was designed to reward the racists and let them keep all the loot they stole.

It was a racist bill put forward by a racist party in a racist coalition and it was defeated by the decent folk in this country.

You lost. Keep crying.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)