this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
253 points (98.5% liked)

World News

1290 readers
621 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

How did they get away with that? One would assume a contract was in force. Was there an ,"no fash CEO" clause? Kind of an important item the story doesn't bother to cover.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Contracts basically always have conditions for each party to back out. There's probably a break fee but for leased vehicles it's probably not that significant.

As a construction company, the Tesla fleet is probably a pretty small portion of their vehicle fleet and cashflow.

Could also be some kind of 'bringing the business into disrepute' clause there.

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago

I reckon online feedback like "fuck this Tesla driving bunch of fascist assholes" would be as big a PR nightmare for the company as its proving for tesla.

[–] XnxCuX@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The US is one of the few countries that would side with Tesla on this. American company or not