this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
321 points (97.1% liked)

Political Memes

8676 readers
3057 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Rooki@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
321
feeding children isn’t up for debate (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 month ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 74 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Her continued work has seen Accurso being attacked by pro-Israeli groups. Last month, in a post on social media, the advocacy group StopAntisemitism asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate if Accurso was “being funded by a foreign party to push anti-Israel propaganda to skew public opinion.”

The group accused the content creator of being an “amplifier of Hamas propaganda,” saying images that she shared of children in Gaza were manipulated. 

Genocide Karens

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The sad irony being that basically everyone on the hill is "being funded by a foreign party to push ~~anti~~ Israel propaganda to skew public opinion."

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“My job is to keep the left pro-Israel”

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Well that was a disgusting read.

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Important to know that "Stopantisemitism" isn't an advocacy group, it's one weird Zionist freak who's sole stated goal is to doxx people who are anti-isreal.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 month ago

since zionism is basically a subcategory of antisemitism its more like startantisemitism am i right

eh maybe a reach sorry if this doesn’t land lol

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I fucking despise lazy journalism like this. Don’t repeat these claims if you aren’t going to investigate them and determine whether they’re true or false. Else it’s nothing but gossip.

Anyone have the details on this claim? Are these images manipulated or is this just hateful BS as usual?

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I fucking guarantee you miss Rachel posted real children

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Precisely. It’s not even worth looking into such claims, because they are simply made to discredit the indisputable truth that children are being killed.

Jean-Paul Sartre, on anti-semites but I find it well applies to this situation too:

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.