this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
29 points (96.8% liked)

Hardware

2494 readers
32 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So does this mean they are giving up on Arc dGPUs? There is no way they can maintain 50% gross margins for Arc.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I agree it's highly unlikely Intel makes much on Arc. But discontinuing it seems incredibly stupid. Even AMD continued Radeon development when it wasn't very profitable for them, and they were short on money for development.
And now Radeon is a significant part of AMD's datacenter compute, that AFAIK is highly profitable.
Of course they are kind of working in the shadow of Nvidia, but Nvidia has such insane profits, that it makes room for high profitability for secondary players, if they can deliver something decent.
And if Nvidia fucks up, AMD is ready.