Flippanarchy

1198 readers

558 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules

If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

733

Liberal Death Cult (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 5 days ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

646 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I suppose that virtually every academic or scientific paper in history is guilty of "deification" because they cite other works.

Uh, what? That's a bad joke, right? You know that's not how academic citations work, right? Forget what I said about academia, that's not for you either.

These are entirely baseless accusations

Mr. "Everyone who criticizes me is a liberal" is against base**less accusations now? Spare me your crocodile tears.

and there is nothing I've said that you can point me as evidence of them. We haven't even really begun to examine the questions of whether his ideas were correct or whether they are applicable to today.

You know the neat thing about text based conversations is you can go back for receipts, right?

because I personally find his arguments compelling and relevant.

And you keep saying I pressed you on theory, which is completely backwards. That was all you champ.

For example, the fact that I've read leftist theory and can cite it to support my positions

For someone who claims to read so much theory, your reading comprehension is not good.

But we've passed the point that I feel like entertaining your bad faith projection. We're done here.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

Great! I knew this wasn't going to go anywhere from the start, as I said. You haven't said a single thing worth reading in this whole conversation, or in any other comment I've ever seen you make. So this seems like a good a time as any to simply block you.