this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
1419 points (97.6% liked)

Political Memes

8730 readers
3989 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (16 children)

It doesn’t work like that. I’ve been saying this for decades, but maybe this explanation from a political strategist will do a better job.

Simply put, the donors want to win to influence the candidates. They base their data on past voters, not the entire electorate. If you don’t vote, you don’t influence. It’s really always been that simple.

We need to stop rewarding those who have the financial means to reach us in our living rooms, and actively seek out the progressives in every primary. Vote in every election. Stop allowing retirees to pick our candidates and continue to push the Overton Window to the right.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I definitely agree with your last paragraph here. Try to vote in progressives in every primary we have access to in order to use voting to make a difference, yes.

However,

the donors want to win

You mean they want everything for themselves by buying politicians, right? Because often times Dem strategy is so incredibly tone deaf the only thing that’s clear about it is that they aren’t trying to win an election, they’re simply doing what the donors tell them to do. In this case, it’s the classic pretend fight, send strongly worded letters, and then let the republicans narrowly pass the massive tax break for the rich. Which is in fact a win for the donors, but nobody else.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That’s not the case if we get behind candidates with good ethics in grassroots campaigns. They choose to accept donations, and can refuse contributions from unsavory donors. We have several clean donor Representatives in the house. It’s not impossible. It just takes our participation.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What do you think fascism is, and what are its causes?

Do you seriously think the German descent into fascism was a result of poltical apathy?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

I’m not entertaining a philosophical debate with someone who equates Harris and Trump.

We can try again when you’re older.

load more comments (12 replies)