this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
42 points (95.7% liked)

World News

48101 readers
2088 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well-known AI chatbots can be configured to routinely answer health queries with false information that appears authoritative, complete with fake citations from real medical journals, Australian researchers have found.

Without better internal safeguards, widely used AI tools can be easily deployed to churn out dangerous health misinformation at high volumes, they warned in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

“If a technology is vulnerable to misuse, malicious actors will inevitably attempt to exploit it - whether for financial gain or to cause harm,” said senior study author Ashley Hopkins of Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health in Adelaide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (13 children)

There should be a series of AI agents in place when a GPT is used. The agents intake the query and review the output before sending it off to the user.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (8 children)

what makes the checker models any more accurate?

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Possibly, reverse motivation - the training goal of such an agent would not be nice and smooth output, but shooting down misinformation.

But I have serious doubts about whether all of that is feasible, given the computational cost of running large language models.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

how does that stop the checker model from "hallucinating" a "yep, this is fine" when it should have said "nah, this is wrong"

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)