this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3961 readers
420 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They don't even need to increase income tax, is the thing. They could just give HMRC an extra 1bn in the budget, and HMRC would bring back 8bn thanks to all the extra investigative staff. They could put VAT on all financial services too, that would raise a few hundred million.

But the main thing would simply be to charge CGT at the same rate as income tax. That closes all sorts of loopholes when it comes to avoiding IHT etc.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I always wondered why first homes were excluded from CGT because it creates perverse incentives in the property market where a home becomes an asset with better returns than any other investment

[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's kind of by design. Every country has a kind of 'total value' that effects IMF loans, World Banking, and general status. The UK is "worth" so much more on paper because of the exorbitant price of property; politicians and homeowners want to keep it high for that reason.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It would increase rental supply if people couldn't turn (much of) a profit by selling houses that are too big for their needs. I get your point though.