this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
19 points (95.2% liked)

World News

39194 readers
579 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don’t think this is actually as bad as people say.

It’s not that we won’t have drinking water. Municipal water use is tiny! And provided with enough incentives (higher costs) people will use less water. And this can be done in very reasonable ways by issuing water tiered rates.

Agricultural water use, is a whole different topic. However, until we can incentives better water management on our massive agricultural lands, it’s only going to get worse.

[–] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

I think the problem is that it will be almost impossible to change policies on water use that will change the economic outlook of so many people.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

As expected of a beehaw user, the perfect liberal answer.

No need to watch fox news anymore, get all your propaganda from beehaw.

[–] rackmountrambo@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Fuck off with the tribalism.

[–] GreatBigJerk@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Beehaw has been popular for like a week. How can there be a typical user?

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s rich coming from a tankie.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

You didn't say woke at least 7 times try again