this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
79 points (98.8% liked)

chat

8446 readers
166 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If it isn't Zionazi freaks, anti-communist fascists, or dog-whistling Ukranazis it's few and far between you find someone who's into military stuff that isn't throwing up the roman salute.

Big shoutout to local hero @Tervell@hexbear.net for reminding me that not all mil geeks are blood and soil weirdos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LupineTroubles@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

Academic history is not very fascist so there is no need to ever concede any interest in history to any fash adjacent group. I am personally very interested in history in general and military history too and almost everything I read on the matter is written by nuanced understanding regardless of what its political or ideological leanings are which range from neoliberal conservative historians to more materialist or Marxist analysis. A lot of pop history is just very fascistic because pop history is superficial and lacks substance, that's also the main appeal of fascism, just a generalized incoherent aesthetic vibe without anything behind it.