this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
282 points (99.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4798 readers
9 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why did they historically not go further east?

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They did, at least into Minnesota. This range map probably doesn't use data from as long ago as when they did.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

I was definitely thinking the time (and method) of this data collection. It kind of appears to reflect US western expansion.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pure guess, but the praries are probably not a good habitat for them. Hard for them to hunt, and the buffalos could easily mess them up.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah trees and mountains make sense. Like the Sierra range in California / Nevada. Or the Rockies. But that map shows way down into Mexico where I imagine it is pretty flat and trees are not as dense (which i guess is kind of similar to a prairie?) Interesting point on the buffalo, i can see that.