this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
849 points (97.9% liked)

Comic Strips

23988 readers
1574 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[old scientist, pointing at some data] After decades of research, thousands of experiments, a massive amount of peer reviewing, we can finally confidently conclude...

[smug dude with a ridiculous hairstyle] Uh yeah, but this TikTok by PatriotEagle1776 says your research is wrong

https://thebad.website/comic/disproven

https://bsky.app/profile/thebad.website

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Did they account for X, Y, Z?

What about all my personal anecodotes!

OMG this was just a survey? HOW IN THE WORLD COULD YOU EVER TELL IF SOMEONE LIED!?

Researchers who already thought of all this and it's in the study: -_-

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Tbf, research based on a survey is much less valuable than a double blind randomized study

[–] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You might need a larger sample, and sometimes a blind study is just not possible.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even then, the error bars are usually huge. If we're talking about cigarette smoke causing lung cancer (which has a relative risk increase of 10,000%) then those error bars aren't an issue. But if you're surveying people for their diet over the past 30 years to connect to colon cancer and you gey a relative risk increase of ~5β„… then the whole thing should be thrown out because the error bars are more like +- 100%

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thus the larger sample, to get something statistically significant. Which might not be practical due to cost.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Some methods suck no matter how much data you throw at it.

The study I was referencing had thousands of people taking their survey and the data quality was terrible because that's what you get when asking people to recall what they ate over the past 20-30 years. Adding yet more people to the study won't clean up the data and would start adding enough cost that it'd be cheaper to do close observation studies of 100 people and woupd actually achieve usable results.

The general guidelines on epidemiological studies (which both of my examples are) is that you cannot draw conclusions from a relative risk increase less than 100%.

So please stop with the blanket statement of "more data means better results". It's not true, and it's the same claim that AI tech bros keep making to fleece gullible investors

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

More data does mean better results.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

More data does mean better results.

So when I can't get a useful trendline on a graph of % of redheads born per number of bananas eaten by the mother, you're saying it's because I didn't collect enough data? Why didn't I think of that?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

No trend is also a result, more data, more confidence.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

A lot of mass media is full of bullshit, and people showing skepticism, asking further questions, and wanting second opinions is generally a good, healthy response. Particularly in an era of Dr. Oz professional bullshit and blaring "Head On, Apply Directly To The Forehead!" style advertisements.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

Lol look at that sample size, only 1000 people